Full-Time Own Use Need: The Requirement of Year-Round Occupancy by the Substitute Occupant | Alfred Legal Services
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Full-Time Own Use Need: The Requirement of Year-Round Occupancy by the Substitute Occupant


Question: Can a landlord use an N12 in Ontario to reclaim a rental unit for personal use if they only plan to live there intermittently?

Answer: In Ontario, an N12 for landlord’s own use generally requires a good-faith intention for full-time residential occupation for at least one year under Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17, s. 48, and intermittent, seasonal, or occasional use may be rejected by the Landlord and Tenant Board.   Alfred Legal Services provides Affordable Legal Help for Ontario tenants and landlords to assess N12 eligibility, evidence requirements, and next steps if the intended use is part-time.


Can a Landlord Reclaim a Rental Unit for Personal Use Via the N12 Eviction Process If the Landlord Intends to Use the Rental Unit Intermittently?

A Landlord Wishing to Take Back a Rental Unit For Own Use Purposes, Must Be Intending to Occupy the Rental Unit On a Full-Time Basis For At Least One-Year.


Understanding the Full-Time Occupancy Requirement Applicable to the Intentions Within the N12 Own Use Eviction Process

Full-Time Own Use Need: The Requirement of Year-Round Occupancy by the Substitute Occupant When a landlord seeks to evict a tenant so to take back a residential rental unit for the personal use of the landlord, or certain family members of the landlord, there is a good faith intention requirement that the landlord, or certain family member, will reside within the rental unit for at least a year.  The requirement of an intended one-year occupancy involves an understanding that the occupancy will be a full-time without an interim use or seasonal use or some other intermittent purpose that involves less than a full-time occupancy intention.

The Law

A landlord may take back or reclaim a rental unit in limited circumstances such as where there landlord requires the rental unit for personal occupancy by the landlord or certain family members of the landlord.  This right to take back a rental unit for certain own use purposes is prescribed by the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, Chapter 17, wherein it is said:


48 (1) A landlord may, by notice, terminate a tenancy if the landlord in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for a period of at least one year by,

(a) the landlord;

(b) the landlord’s spouse;

(c) a child or parent of the landlord or the landlord’s spouse; or

(d) a person who provides or will provide care services to the landlord, the landlord’s spouse, or a child or parent of the landlord or the landlord’s spouse, if the person receiving the care services resides or will reside in the building, related group of buildings, mobile home park or land lease community in which the rental unit is located.

(2) The date for termination specified in the notice shall be at least 60 days after the notice is given and shall be the day a period of the tenancy ends or, where the tenancy is for a fixed term, the end of the term.

(3) A tenant who receives notice of termination under subsection (1) may, at any time before the date specified in the notice, terminate the tenancy, effective on a specified date earlier than the date set out in the landlord’s notice.

(4) The date for termination specified in the tenant’s notice shall be at least 10 days after the date the tenant’s notice is given.

(5) This section does not authorize a landlord to give a notice of termination of a tenancy with respect to a rental unit unless,

(a) the rental unit is owned in whole or in part by an individual; and

(b) the landlord is an individual.

Requirements
Intended Full-time Occupancy

While the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, Chapter 17, lacks explicit detail on this point, case law decisions show that the occupancy by the landlord, or by the close family member of landlord, must be a full-time occupancy.  Accordingly, a landlord that wishes to evict a tenant for the purpose of a part-time occupancy, such as for the use of a son or daughter while attending college or university on a less than year-round basis, may find difficulty with an eviction intended for such a purpose.  The requirement of full-time occupancy was addressed within the case of Kohen v. Warner, 2018 ONSC 3865, wherein the Divisional Court reviewed a decision of the Landlord Tenant Board and it was said:


[9]  The Landlord submits that the Member erred in law in determining that he was bound to dismiss the application by virtue of the decision in MacDonald v. Richard, [2008] O.J. No. 6076 (Div. Ct.), which he said was “binding precedent providing that occasional occupation is not what is intended” by s. 48(1) of the Act.

[10] The Landlord submits that the proposed occupation of the unit by the landlord’s daughter in MacDonald was a temporary 4 month occupation only and that this use was distinguishable from the case at bar, as Sedat would be living in the unit occasionally (on weekends during the school year and during the summer months) for 5 years.  Amicus agrees with the Landlord that the Member was not bound by the MacDonald case, which involved temporary occupancy.  Amicus submits that Sedat’s indefinite part-time occupancy may well fit within the Landlord’s s. 48(1) rights if that use is regular and structured.

[11] In our view, it is clear from the Member’s reasons, read as a whole, that the Member did not misstate the law in MacDonald nor did he decide the outcome of this case solely on the basis of MacDonald.  The Member correctly stated s. 48(1) of the Act and the test in that section that applied.  The Member further referred to the cases cited in MacDonald, and to other Board cases, in which occasional occupation of a unit by a landlord’s family was held not to be sufficient to displace a tenant.  The Member then applied the principles from those cases to the facts before him to conclude that the proposed intermittent use of the unit by Sedat did not entitle the Landlord to terminate the existing tenancy pursuant to s. 48(1) of the Act.

Conclusion

A landlord seeking to take back a rental unit for own use purposes via the N12 eviction process, must have an intention to occupy the rental unit for at least one-year on a full-time basis.  If a landlord wishes to displace a tenured tenant from a rental unit and subsequently use the unit for merely a seasonal purposes, the landlord may be found as improperly using the N12 eviction process.

Need Help?Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
7

NOTE: Many searches involving “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” often reflect a need for immediate, capable legal representation rather than a specific professional title.  In the province of Ontario, licensed paralegals are regulated by the same Law Society that oversees lawyers and are authorized to represent clients in designated litigation matters.  Advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural skill are central to that role.  Alfred Legal Services delivers representation within its licensed mandate, concentrating on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and persuasive advocacy aimed at achieving efficient and favourable resolutions for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Alfred Legal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Alfred Legal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.216.215



Sign
Up

Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A