Yes No Share to Facebook
Taking Judicial Notice The Acceptance of Alleged Facts As True Without Evidence
Does a Judge Always Need Proof That a Fact Is True?
Where a Fact Is So Notoriously Known As Being True a Judge May Take Judicial Notice of the Fact Without Requiring Evidence.
Understanding the Principle Known As Taking Judicial Notice Without Evidence of Notoriously Known Truths
Facts that are notorious known, meaning so known that everyone with common knowledge would agree that the fact is true are facts for which a court may take judicial notice of the fact without requiring proof of the fact via some form of evidence. Examples of notorious facts include common knowledge that water is wet, the Sun is bright, and gasoline is flammable.
The Law
The circumstances or legal criteria required for a judge to determine that a fact may be deemed true by judicial notice rather than via some form of actual evidence was explained within, among other cases, Taylor v. Hanley Hospitality Inc., 2022 ONCA 376, wherein it was said:
[30] The concept of judicial notice allows a court to receive “facts” that are “so notorious or uncontroversial that evidence of their existence is unnecessary”. This does not allow parties “to put before the court controversial evidence to the prejudice of the opposing party without providing a proper opportunity for its truth to be tested”: Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2000 SCC 2, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 5. The threshold for judicial notice is strict since the facts are not proved by evidence under oath nor tested by cross-examination: R. v. Find, 2001 SCC 32, [2001] S.C.R. 863, at para. 48.
As explained in Taylor, judicial notice allows a court to accept as factual those facts that are so notoriously known and uncontroversial that evidence becomes unnecessary.
Summary Comment
The taking of judicial notice involves a court accepting certain facts as true without the need of evidentiary proof and involves things so commonly known.
NOTE: A significant volume of online queries such as “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically indicates a desire for prompt and effective legal assistance rather than a particular designation. In Ontario, the same Law Society that regulates lawyers also governs licensed paralegals, empowering them to represent clients in stipulated litigation issues. Essential to this role are advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise. Alfred Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and compelling advocacy intended to secure efficient and positive outcomes for clients.