Yes No Share to Facebook
Adjudicative Jurisdiction: The Types of Cases Handled Within Small Claims Court Proceedings
Question: What kinds of disputes and remedies can I bring to Ontario Small Claims Court?
Answer: In Ontario, Small Claims Court can award money up to the court’s monetary limit or order the return of personal property up to that value, but it generally can’t grant remedies like injunctions, declarations, cancelling contracts, or detailed accountings, as set out in Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 (ss. 23(1) and 25). For Affordable Legal Help in Ontario, Alfred Legal Services can review your facts, confirm whether your claim fits within Small Claims Court jurisdiction, and help you prepare and file the right documents for a practical, cost-conscious approach.
Litigative Subject-Matter Authority
The Small Claims Court is part of the Superior Court of Justice and is designed to handle everyday civil disputes in an accessible way. The law defines what kinds of cases the Court can decide, setting thereby setting its subject-matter jurisdiction.
The Law
The authority of the Small Claims Court is set out in section 23(1) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, which says in simple terms that the Court may only grant remedies for the payment of money or the return of personal property, each within the prescribed monetary limit. Other forms of relief, such as injunctions, declarations, contract rescission, or accountings, are outside its reach and must be pursued in higher court. At the same time, section 25 directs the Small Claims Court to decide “all questions of law and fact” that arise in cases properly before it. This means that as long as the claim is for money or personal property within the limit, the Small Claims Court may hear virtually any cause of action, from breach of contract to negligence and beyond. Put plainly, the Small Claims Court is narrow in remedies but broad in subject matter: it can deal with almost any type of dispute, but only where the requested outcome is money or the return of property within its jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction
23 (1) The Small Claims Court,
(a) has jurisdiction in any action for the payment of money where the amount claimed does not exceed the prescribed amount exclusive of interest and costs; and
(b) has jurisdiction in any action for the recovery of possession of personal property where the value of the property does not exceed the prescribed amount.
...
Summary hearings
25 The Small Claims Court shall hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in Maple Ridge Community Management Ltd. v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2015 ONCA 520, highlighted the essential role of the Small Claims Court in promoting access to justice. While citing the Supreme Court decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, the Court of Appeal emphasized that access to justice is among the greatest challenges facing the Canadian legal system, with rising costs and delays threatening the rule of law. Building on that principle, the Court of Appeal observed that the Small Claims Court mandate per section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact” serves a vital function by offering meaningful and cost-effective adjudication of disputes involving modest claims. The Small Claims Court, with simplified processes designed to handle a high volume of cases efficiently, thereby helps to ensure that individuals who might otherwise be unable to afford litigation can still pursue or defend their legal rights.
[33] The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that access to justice is a significant and ongoing challenge to the justice system with the potential to threaten the rule of law. In Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, at para. 1, the court held:
Ensuring access to justice is the greatest challenge to the rule of law in Canada today. Trials have become increasingly expensive and protracted. Most Canadians cannot afford to sue when they are wronged or defend themselves when they are sued, and cannot afford to go to trial. Without an effective and accessible means of enforcing rights, the rule of law is threatened. Without public adjudication of civil cases, the development of the common law is stunted.
[34] The Small Claims Court is mandated under s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.” The Small Claims Court plays a vital role in the administration of justice in the province by ensuring meaningful and cost effective access to justice for cases involving relatively modest claims for damages. In order to meet its mandate, the Small Claims Court’s process and procedures are designed to ensure that it can handle a large volume of cases in an efficient and economical manner.
The Superior Court in Ontario Deputy Judges Association v. Ontario, 2005 CanLII 42263 indirectly highlighted just how many different kinds of cases can appear in the Small Claims Court. Although the ruling focused mainly on the duties of Deputy Judges, the Court observed that they may hear disputes involving Charter rights, defamation, creditor claims, intellectual property, estates, and even medical malpractice. The remedies remain limited, usually money or the return of personal property, but the case shows that Deputy Judges regularly face a wide range of legal issues. As the Court noted, the Small Claims Court is Ontario’s busiest court and often involves surprisingly complex cases, even within its financial limits.
[18] Deputy judges can hear a wide range of cases and have broad jurisdiction over proceedings involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, defamation, creditors' rights, intellectual property claims, estate litigation, and medical malpractice, among others. Deputy judges also exercise a form of equitable jurisdiction, which adds to their role and responsibilities as judicial officers. The Small Claims Court can hear and determine all questions of law and fact and may make orders considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
...
[20] Deputy judges carry out judicial functions for large numbers of litigants contesting significant sums of money. The Small Claims Court is the busiest court in Ontario and the court that citizens are most likely to encounter. Litigants in Small Claims Court are increasingly represented by counsel and contend with increasingly complex legal issues. ...
Conclusion
The subject-matter jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court is both limited and expansive. It is limited in the sense that only certain remedies; namely, the payment of money or the recovery of personal property within the prescribed threshold may be granted. Yet within those boundaries, the adjudicative jurisdiction is expansive, allowing a wide range of legal disputes across many causes of action. This balance reflects the statutory design: to provide a simplified, efficient, and cost-effective forum, for resolving disputes that might otherwise be inaccessible to many litigants. By doing so, the Small Claims Court fulfills an essential role in advancing access to justice while ensuring the rule of law is meaningfully available.
NOTE: A significant quantity of online searches for “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” often indicate a pressing requirement for effective legal assistance rather than a particular profession. In Ontario, paralegals who hold a license are governed by the same Law Society that manages lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specified litigation situations. Essential to this role are advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise. Alfred Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at securing efficient and favourable outcomes for clients.